Skip to content

Dr Thor Timothy

Pain Specialist & Anaesthesiologist · Singapore

What a new RFA technique comparison could mean

PAIN RESEARCH NEWS

Abstract-based research summary · Study published 22 October 2026 · Sources checked 10 November 2026

What improved?

In a small randomised trial, six-month pain improvement favoured a lateral-deployment cannula by 2.8 points (95% CI 1.6–4.0). The analysis included 84 of 90 participants. [1]

Limitations and safety

Both groups received RFA; this does not test RFA against sham treatment. No major complications were reported. Full methods, funding and minor-harm details were unavailable. [1]

What does this mean for patients?

Treatment selection still starts with assessment. NICE describes a role for lumbar denervation in selected people after a positive medial branch block. A study comparing equipment should inform that conversation without replacing it. [2]

Useful questions are: Why is this procedure being considered? What alternatives are reasonable? What benefit would justify its risks and recovery for me?

Sources

[1] Kahraman et al. (2026): published trial abstract. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000003187. PMID: 42908078.

[2] NICE NG59: recommendations.

This is a general research summary, not a personal treatment recommendation.

Back to Pain Research News